Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of Print

Evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer using biparametric magnetic resonance imaging: An evolving concept


1 Department of Radio-Diagnosis and Imaging, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
2 Department of Radio-Diagnosis and Imaging, ASCOMS Hospital, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India, India
3 Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College, Kathua, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Correspondence Address:
Poonam Sharma,
House No 109, Sector-7, Channi Himmat, Jammu - 180 015, Jammu and Kashmir
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1313_20

Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) of prostate involves a combination of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) scans. However, controversy exists in the literature regarding the true value of DCE in the detection of clinically significant (CS) prostate cancer (PCa). Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the role of biparametric MRI (bp-MRI) and mp-MRI in the detection of CS PCa. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six patients with raised serum prostate-specific antigen levels were included. Bp-MRI was performed in all patients, whereas mp-MRI was performed in 30 cases only. The findings were characterized on the basis of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) v2 grading. PI-RADS v2 score of 3 or more was considered CS PCa. All patients underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. Gleason score >6 was considered CS. Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS software and results interpreted. Results: CS PCa was observed in 31 cases on histopathology. On bp-MRI, CS PCa was seen in 31 patients. Five cases of PI-RADS v2 score 3 were seen on bp-MRI and 3 of them were upgraded to PI-RADS 4 on DCE images. One case of PI-RADS 3 had low Gleason score on biopsy, whereas 1 case of PI-RADS 2 had CS PCa on biopsy. No significant difference was observed between bp-MRI and mp-MRI in the detection of CS PCa. Conclusions: Both bp-MRI and mp-MRI have high sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy and were nearly identical in the detection of CS PCa with no significant advantage of DCE images.


Print this article
Search
 Back
 
  Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Mahajan M
    -  Gupta V
    -  Gupta P
    -  Sharma P
    -  Abrol D
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed187    
    PDF Downloaded5    

Recommend this journal