Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of Print

Laparoscopic-assisted surgery versus open surgery for transverse colon cancer: A multicenter retrospective study


1 Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
2 Department of Surgery, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
3 Department of Surgery, Fujisawa Shonandai Hospital, Takakura, Fujisawa, Japan

Correspondence Address:
Hiroshi Tamagawa,
Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama 236-0004
Japan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_946_20

Introduction: Previous randomized controlled trials demonstrated similar oncological outcomes between laparoscopic-assisted (LA) and open (OP) colectomy; however, patients with transverse colon cancer were not analyzed. The aim of this study was to confirm the oncological safety and the advantages of the short- and long-term results of LA surgery for transverse colon cancer in comparison to OP surgery. Materials and Methods: The study data were retrospectively collected from the databases of four hospitals. Patients with transverse colon cancer who underwent LA or OP R0 or R1 resection were registered. Results: Among the 204 patients, 149 underwent OP colectomy and 55 underwent LA colectomy. The median follow-up period was 43 months. The rate of conversion to OP resection was 7.3%. The 5-year overall survival rate of the LA group was higher than that of the OP surgery group for all-stage patients (97.5% vs. 91.1%, P = 0.108), and it was similar in Stage II and Stage III patients (94.1% vs. 94.2%, P = 0.510). The LA group had significantly lower blood loss and a significantly longer operative time in comparison to the OP surgery group. Furthermore, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (9 vs. 13 days, P = 0.001) and the incidence of Grade ≥III complications was lower in the LA group (3.7% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.031). Conclusion: We concluded that LA surgery for transverse colon cancer is oncologically safe and yields better short-term results in comparison to OP surgery.


Print this article
Search
 Back
 
  Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Tamagawa H
    -  Numata M
    -  Aoyama T
    -  Kazama K
    -  Maezawa Y
    -  Atsumi Y
    -  Hara K
    -  Kano K
    -  Komori K
    -  Kawahara S
    -  Yukawa N
    -  Sawazaki S
    -  Saeki H
    -  Godai T
    -  Rino Y
    -  Masuda M
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed221    
    PDF Downloaded5    

Recommend this journal