|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 7 | Page : 1547-1552
Specific inhibition of Notch1 signaling suppresses properties of lung cancer stem cells
Haibo Cai1, Wei Lu2, Yueying Zhang3, Hengyao Liu3, Zhaopeng Wang3, Yi Shen4
1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong Province, P.R. China
2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong Province, P.R. China
3 Department of Experimental Pathology and Pathophysiology, Institute of Basic Medicine, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong Province, P.R. China
4 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, P.R. China
|Date of Submission||06-Jun-2017|
|Date of Decision||27-Jun-2017|
|Date of Acceptance||13-Jul-2017|
|Date of Web Publication||13-Jan-2020|
Dr. Yi Shen
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16, Jiangsu Road, Qingdao City, Shandong Province 266003
Dr. Yueying Zhang
Department of Experimental Pathology and Pathophysiology, Institute of Basic Medicine, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong Province 266003
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Objective: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide with a relatively low 5-year relative survival rate of 16%. Novel and efficient therapeutic approach for lung cancer is desperately needed.
Materials and Methods: Targeting cancer stem cells (CSCs) provides a promising strategy to eradicate malignancies. The Notch signaling pathway plays an important role in the control of cell fates and developmental processes including CSCs. The function of Notch1 in the regulation of CSCs and whether targeting Notch1 could be a potential therapy for lung cancer were explored in this study. Lung CSCs (LCSCs) were isolated from A549 cells and identified as CD44+/CD24– cells by magnetic-assisted cell sorting, then the putative LCSCs were treated with Notch1 inhibitor and Notch1 small interfering RNAs (siRNAs); the growth and proliferation of LCSCs were investigated to test the effect of Notch1 blocking on the growth and viability of LCSCs.
Results: CD44+/CD24– cells isolated from A549 cells possessed stem cell-like properties with high expression of Notch1. Blocking Notch1 by inhibitor DAPT or siRNA both inhibited the growth capacity of LCSCs.
Conclusion: Our discovery demonstrated a depression of growth in CD44+/CD24– and A549 cells caused by blockade of Notch signaling pathway. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the detailed effects of Notch1 blocking on the LCSCs. Nevertheless, targeting the Notch pathway has exhibited great potential to be an improved lung cancer treatment.
Keywords: CD24, CD44, lung cancer stem cells, Notch1, siRNA
|How to cite this article:|
Cai H, Lu W, Zhang Y, Liu H, Wang Z, Shen Y. Specific inhibition of Notch1 signaling suppresses properties of lung cancer stem cells. J Can Res Ther 2019;15:1547-52
Yueying Zhang and Yi Shen contributed equally to this work
| > Introduction|| |
Lung cancer remains to be a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In China, 432,400 males and 177,800 females died of lung cancer in 2015. The current treatments of lung cancer are mostly surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. However, the 5-year relative survival rate for lung cancer remains only 16% mainly on account of tumor metastasis and resistance. A novel and efficient therapeutic approach for lung cancer is desperately needed.
Recent studies found that a subpopulation cancer cells were more origin of cancer relapse and these cells also played a critical role in cancer progression, metastasis, and resistance which were named cancer stem cells (CSCs). The first CSCs, CD44+/CD24− breast CSCs, were first isolated by Al-Hajj et al. in solid tumor. Now, it was reported that CSCs were isolated in brain cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, and other cancers., The CSC hypothesis has attracted much attention due to the potential for discovery and development of CSC-related therapies and the identification of key molecules involved in controlling the unique properties of CSC populations. Targeting CSCs provided a promising strategy to eradicate malignancies, and identification of the key molecules in CSC growth is critically important in cancer therapy. To target CSCs in cancer therapy, it will be the first step to isolate and identify CSCs. There are three types of methods to isolate CSCs by now: sphere formation, isolation by flow cytometry based on surface markers, or isolating side population. Surface markers are the most popular method for CSCs isolation and identification. Previous studies have reported some lung CSCs (LCSCs) markers such as CD44, CD24, ABCG2, CD133, and aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH). In this study, we used CD44 and CD24 as markers to isolating LCSCs from lung cancer cell line A549 cells, and the isolated CSCs were identified by sphere formation assay and the expression of another LCSCs marker ALDH1A.
Based on the hypothesis that the tumor stem cells originate from common stem cells, the signaling pathway regulating the normal stem cell self-renewal and differentiation may also play a role in tumor stem cells. The Notch signaling pathway is considered to play an important role in the control of cell fates and developmental processes. Notch1 is a member of the Notch family and serves as receptors for Notch ligands. Recent studies have shown that Notch1 is implicated in carcinogenesis in a variety of human malignancies by regulating many basic processes essential for cancer development and progression including the cell growth, survival, apoptosis, migration, and invasion, suggesting a potential role for Notch1 as a therapeutic target of cancer. In lung cancer, previous studies have shown that Notch1 acts as a driver of lung tumor initiation, growth, and metastasis. To explore the function of the Notch1 in the regulation of CSCs and whether targeting Notch1 could be a potential therapy for lung cancer, the isolated LCSCs were treated with Notch1 inhibitor and Notch1 small interfering RNA (siRNA) to investigate the effect of Notch1 blocking in LCSCs.
| > Materials and Methods|| |
The human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549 was obtained from China Center for Type Culture Collection, Wuhan, China. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM, Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (HyClone, USA) and antibiotics (100 units/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin). Cultures were maintained in incubator at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Isolation of CD44+/CD24− cells
Magnetic-assisted cell sorting (MACS) was used for the sequential separation of CD24− followed by CD44+ population. The cells were labeled with CD24− biotin antibody (Miltenyi Biotec), incubated at 4°C for 15 min, washed, and further labeled with Anti-Biotin MicroBeads of MultiSort kit. After incubation, cells were washed and re-suspended. Magnetic separation was carried out with the help of LS columns arranged in the magnetic field of a magnetic separator. The CD24 depleted fraction was collected in flow-through and further subjected to CD44 magnetic labeling and purification to isolate the putative stem cells (CD44+/CD24−). The labeled cells were treated with the MicroBead release reagent followed by stop release agent provided in the kit. The MACS sorted cell populations were tested for percentage purification using flow cytometry.
Inhibition of Notch1 by DAPT and small interfering RNA
Isolated CD44+/CD24− cells were treated with γ-secretase inhibitor - DAPT in different concentrations (0, 25, 50, and 75 μM) for 48 h to block the Notch1 signaling pathway. siRNAs were also constructed to block Notch1. siRNA vectors targeting to Notch1 gene were synthesized by Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Commercially available siRNA to random noncoding sequences (scrambled siRNA) was used for control transductions. Cells were plated at a density of 5 × 105 cells per well in 6-well dishes and settled overnight. Cells were transfected with constructs and/or siRNA using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA) next morning.
After sorting, isolated CD44+/CD24− cells and unsorted A549 cells were washed with PBS, centrifuged under 800 × g centrifugal force for 3 min, and then resuspended in 200 mL of PBS. An aliquot was taken from each sample and placed on glass slides coated with poly-L-lysine followed by 15 min' incubation in a cell culture incubator. Then, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, blocked with BSA 100 mg/mL for 1 h at room temperature, and incubated with anti-ALDH1A-allophycocyanin (1:100) overnight at 4°C. Glass slides were then mounted using VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Finally, images were collected under Zeiss confocal microscope.
Sphere forming assay
Cells were cultured at a density of 5000 viable cells/mL in low adherent 35 mm dishes (Costar) under serum-free condition and supplemented with 20 mg/mL of insulin, 20 mg/mL epidermal growth factor, and 10 mg/mL of basic fibroblast growth factor (Invitrogen) for 21 days. Formation of sphere-like structures was visible at 4–7 days, and the photographs of comparable groups were captured under phase-contrast microscope (Leica CTR4000) at ×20 magnification at 7–14 days.
Colony formation assay
The CD44+/CD24− cells with different treatment were split into 6-well dishes at 1 × 103 cells/well and cultured for 7–10 days with medium change every 2–3 days. Eight days later, the colonies were observed under microscope and taken pictures at day 7. Colonies for three independent experiments were counted.
Cell proliferation assays
The Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) (Beyotime, China) was used to quantify the proliferation of CD44+/CD24− cells with different treatments. The major constituent of the kit is 2-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt (WST-8). Cells were dispensed at a density of 3 × 105 cells/mL in medium and seeded at 100 μl/well in a 96-well plate. The plate was incubated for the appropriate length of time (24, 48, 72, and 96 h) in the incubator, and 10 μl of CCK-8 solution was added to each well of the plate. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a microplate reader after an hour.
Real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis
Total RNA was extracted from the cells using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and reverse transcribed to cDNA using Verso cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., MD). Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was carried out using start universal SYBR Green master mix (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) on the 7500 Fast RT-PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Data were normalized with β-actin. The primer sequences of Notch1 are listed as below: forward 5'-CACTGTGGGCGGGTCC-3' and reverse 5'-GTTGTATTGGTTCGGCACCAT-3'.
Cells were lysed in NP-40 lysis buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 1× protease inhibitor cocktail. Clear cell lysates were measured with Bradford reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Equivalent amounts of proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE (8%–10%), transferred on to PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica,) and immunoblotted with primary antibodies: Notch1, ALDH1A, GAPDH, and β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA) followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Sigma). Bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA).
Each treatment had triplicates and at least three independent experiments were performed for statistics. All data were represented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test for comparison between two groups or one-way ANOVA test for more than two groups by SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P = 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| > Results|| |
CD44+/CD24− cells possessed stem cell-like properties with highly expression of Notch1. The putative LCSCs were isolated in A549 cells by MACS and then the percentage of CD44+/CD24− cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. Results showed that the percentage of CD44+/CD24− cells in A549 cells was 7.45%. Since tumor sphere culture has been widely used to assess the self-renewal potential of stem cells and CSCs, tumor sphere culture was employed to explore the stem cell potential of CD44+/CD24− cells. Spheroid colonies can be observed after in vitro culture for 7–14 days in serum-free media under nonadherent conditions [Figure 1]a. Compared with unsorted A549 cells, sphere formation of CD44+/CD24− cells was more quickly, and the spheres were bigger. As one of the well-known CSC-related makers, the expression of ALDH1A was detected in the isolated CD44+/CD24− cells; results showed that ALDH1A was highly expressed in the CD44+/CD24− cells compared with A549 cells [Figure 1]b. These results suggested that the CD44+/CD24− cells possessed stem cell-like properties and could be regarded as LCSCs.
|Figure 1: Isolation and identification of CD44+/CD24− cells from A549 cells and the detection of Notch1 expression. (a) Spheres formed by isolated CD44+/CD24− cells under serum-free culture conditions. (b) Expression of cancer stem cells marker ALDH1A in CD44+/CD24− cells and unsorted A549 cells was detected by immunocytochemistry. (c) Expression of Notch1 mRNA in CD44+/CD24− cells and unsorted A549 cells was detected by polymerase chain reaction. (d) Expression of Notch1 protein in CD44+/CD24− cells and unsorted A549 cells was detected by western blot|
Click here to view
To explore the role of Notch pathway in LCSCs, first we detected the expression of Notch1 in the CD44+/CD24− cells by real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR and Western blot analyses. RT-PCR revealed that both A549 cells and the CD44+/CD24− cells expressed Notch1, but CD44+/CD24− cells expressed significantly higher levels than A549 cells (P < 0.05) [Figure 1]c. Western blotting analysis provided similar results to those obtained by RT-PCR (P < 0.05) [Figure 1]d. Treatment with DAPT could inhibit the growth of CD44+/CD24− cells
To study the role of the Notch signaling pathway in the growth of LCSCs, N-[N-(3,5-difluorophenacetyl)-L-alanyl]-2-phenylglycinetert-butyl ester (DAPT, GSI-IX) was used as a γ-secretase inhibitor. DAPT has been shown to cause a reduction in Ab40 and Ab42 levels and inhibit Notch signaling in human cancer cells. CD44+/CD24− cells were treated with different concentrations of DAPT, and the effect of Notch1 inhibition was detected by RT-PCR and Western blot. Results showed that DAPT treatment decreased both the mRNA and protein expression of Notch1 [Figure 2]a and [Figure 2]b. The inhibition of Notch1 expression was positively correlated with the concentration of DAPT and the lowest expression of Notch1 was observed when the cells were treated with 75 μM DAPT. Besides, we observed that DAPT could inhibit the growth of CD44+/CD24− cells, and the effect was also positively correlated with DAPT concentration. After being treated with 50 μM DAPT for 2 weeks, colony-forming assay showed that the growth of CD44+/CD24− cells was significantly slower compared with control (P < 0.05) [Figure 2]c suggesting that blocking Notch signaling could inhibit the growth of LCSCs.
|Figure 2: CD44+/CD24− cells were treated with Notch1 inhibitor DAPT. (a) Expression of Notch1 mRNA in CD44+/CD24− cells treated with DAPT in different concentrations (0, 25, 50, and 75 μM) for 72 h was detected by polymerase chain reaction. (b) Expression of Notch1 protein in CD44+/CD24− cells treated with DAPT in different concentrations (0, 25, 50, and 75 μM) for 72 h was detected by western blot. (c) Proliferation of CD44+/CD24− cells after treatment with 50 μM DAPT for 2 weeks was detected by colony-forming assay|
Click here to view
Notch1 silencing by siRNAs could inhibit cell growth and cell cycle in CD44+/CD24− cells.
To further determine whether inhibition of Notch1 expression could induce growth arrest in CD44+/CD24− cells, we transfected Notch1 siRNA or the control scrambled siRNA into CD44+/CD24− cells and examined cell viability by colony-forming assay and CCK-8 assay, the cell cycle analysis was also conducted with FACS to invest the effect of Notch1 silencing to the cell cycle of the putative LCSCs. We obtained four Notch1 siRNAs, and the interfering effect of each siRNA was detected by PCR and Western blot and the most efficient siRNA (siRNA-4) was chosen [Figure 3]a and [Figure 3]b. The interfering effect of siRNA-2 was further verified by Western blot and results showed that the protein expression of Notch1 could be reduced by half with siRNA-2. Besides, we observed that the expression of ALDH1A, one of the CSC markers, was also significantly decreased by Notch1 silencing [Figure 4]a, suggesting Notch1 plays a role in stemness maintenance of LCSCs. The sphere forming assay showed that the silencing of Notch1 significantly inhibited the formation of spheres compared with control group [Figure 4]b and [Figure 4]c. After being treated with siRNA, CCK-8 assay revealed that the number of viable cells was decreased by >50% in siRNA transfected as compared with that in the scrambled siRNA-transfected cells [Figure 4]d. These results suggest that Notch1 may be an important target for inhibiting LCSC growth.
|Figure 3: Small interfering RNAs targeting Notch1 were constructed and the interfering efficiency was detected. (a) The expression of Notch1 mRNA in CD44+/CD24− cells treated with different siRNAs was detected by polymerase chain reaction. (b) The expression of Notch1 protein in CD44+/CD24− cells treated with different siRNAs was detected by western blot|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: CD44+/CD24− cells were treated with Notch1 siRNA-2. (a) The protein expressions of Notch1 and ALDH1A in CD44+/CD24− cells treated with siRNA-4 and control siRNAs were analyzed by western blot (left) and gray scale scanning (right). (b) Spheres formed by CD44+/CD24− cells treated with siRNA-4 and control siRNAs. (c) Quantitative analysis of sphere-forming efficiency (left) and sphere numbers (right) formed from CD44+/CD24− cells treated with siRNA-4 and control siRNAs. (d) Cell proliferation of CD44+/CD24− cells treated with different siRNAs was detected by CCK-8|
Click here to view
| > Discussion|| |
CSC is one of the hot spots in cancer research in recent years, which have been shown to possess the ability of self-renewal and differentiation in many studies. Compared with normal cancer cells, CSCs are considered more tumorigenic and can easily cause tumor relapse and metastasis by generating new tumors. In some in vivo experiments, small amounts of tumor stem cells can be injected into nude mice, and the rate of tumor growth is higher than that of common tumors. There are three major methods to isolate and identify CSCs mainly through their biological characteristics; surface marker is the most popular method for CSCs isolation and identification. For LCSCs, different studies have reported some different markers such as CD44, CD24, ABCG2, CD133, and ALDH. In a recent study, in the human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549 cells, a subpopulation with high expression of CD44 and low expression of CD24 (CD44+/CD24−) showed stem cell characteristics and was considered as LCSCs. In our study, MACS was used for the sequential separation of CD24− followed by CD44+ population to isolate CD44+/CD24− cells from the adenocarcinoma cell line A549 and the isolated CD44+/CD24− cells were identified. We observed that the population of CD44+/CD24− cells represented only a small proportion of all A549 cells (about 7.45%). Since tumor sphere culture has been widely used to assess the self-renewal potential of stem cells and CSCs, tumor sphere culture was employed to explore the stem cell potential of CD44+/CD24− cells. Spheroid colonies can be generated from CD44+/CD24− cells after in vitro culture for 7–14 days in serum-free media under nonadherent conditions, proving the self-renewal potential of the CD44+/CD24− cells. Besides, as one of the well-known CSC-related makers, the expression of ALDH1A was also demonstrated in CD44+/CD24− cells. These results again confirmed that the CD44+/CD24− cells possessed stem cell-like properties and could be regarded as LCSCs.
The Notch signaling pathway has been known as a key pathway to regulate the differentiation of epithelial progenitors during lung development., The dysfunction of the Notch pathway has been found in many lung cancers and is a relatively frequent event in nonsmall cell lung cancers. The upregulation of Notch signaling contributes to lung cancer clonogenic capacity in vitro, and downregulation of Notch signaling inhibits the growth, migration, and invasiveness of cancer cells and induces cell apoptosis. However, there are also some controversial researches with opposite outcomes, and some studies reported that the overexpression of Notch signaling can cause cell cycle arrest and depress the growth of cancer cells, suggesting that the regulation of cell function by Notch signaling in cancer cells may highly depend on cellular contexts.
Notch1 is a transmembrane protein belonging to the NOTCH family. By binding with Notch ligands, Notch1 is cleaved by proteases such as γ-secretases, to release the intracellular domain NICD1 which translocates to the nucleus and acts as a transcription cofactor to regulate target gene expression., Recent studies showed that Notch1 is closely related with carcinogenesis in a variety of human malignancies by regulating many basic processes essential for cancer development and progression including the cell growth, survival, apoptosis, migration, and invasion, suggesting a potential role for Notch1 as a therapeutic target for cancer. Previous studies showed that Notch1 could act as a driver of lung tumor initiation, growth, and metastasis; however, completely opposite findings were also reported, suggesting that the role of Notch1 in lung cancer may be associated with disease subtypes or specific genetic changes in a context-dependent manner. In this study, we found that Notch1was highly expressed in the isolated CD44+/CD24− cells. When Notch1 signaling in the CD44+/CD24− cells was inhibited by DAPT, the growth and proliferation of CD44+/CD24− cells were also inhibited. The blocking of Notch1 by siRNA showed similar results.
| > Conclusion|| |
Our discovery demonstrated a depression of growth in CD44+/CD24− and A549 cells caused by blockade of Notch signaling pathway. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the detailed effects of Notch1 blocking on the LCSCs. Nevertheless, targeting the Notch pathway has exhibited great potential to be an improved lung cancer treatment.
Financial support and sponsorship
The study was supported by funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81403150), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2014HL064) and the Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| > References|| |
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al.
Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:115-32.
Arenberg D, Dubinett SM. Lung cancer: Evolving concepts in management. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2016;37:647-48.
Heuvers ME, Hegmans JP, Stricker BH, Aerts JG. Improving lung cancer survival; time to move on. BMC Pulm Med 2012;12:77.
Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:3983-8.
Piccirillo SG, Reynolds BA, Zanetti N, Lamorte G, Binda E, Broggi G, et al.
Bone morphogenetic proteins inhibit the tumorigenic potential of human brain tumour-initiating cells. Nature 2006;444:761-5.
O'Brien CA, Pollett A, Gallinger S, Dick JE. A human colon cancer cell capable of initiating tumour growth in immunodeficient mice. Nature 2007;445:106-10.
Kim CF, Jackson EL, Woolfenden AE, Lawrence S, Babar I, Vogel S, et al.
Identification of bronchioalveolar stem cells in normal lung and lung cancer. Cell 2005;121:823-35.
Szotek PP, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Masiakos PT, Dinulescu DM, Connolly D, Foster R, et al.
Ovarian cancer side population defines cells with stem cell-like characteristics and mullerian inhibiting substance responsiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:11154-9.
Fang D, Nguyen TK, Leishear K, Finko R, Kulp AN, Hotz S, et al.
A tumorigenic subpopulation with stem cell properties in melanomas. Cancer Res 2005;65:9328-37.
Dalerba P, Cho RW, Clarke MF. Cancer stem cells: Models and concepts. Annu Rev Med 2007;58:267-84.
Tirino V, Desiderio V, Paino F, De Rosa A, Papaccio F, La Noce M, et al.
Cancer stem cells in solid tumors: An overview and new approaches for their isolation and characterization. FASEB J 2013;27:13-24.
Wang J, Li ZH, White J, Zhang LB. Lung cancer stem cells and implications for future therapeutics. Cell Biochem Biophys 2014;69:389-98.
Bolos V, Gregobessa J, La Pompa JL. Notch signaling in development and cancer. Endocr Rev 2006;28:339-63.
Guo H, Lu Y, Wang J, Liu X, Keller ET, Liu Q, et al.
Targeting the notch signaling pathway in cancer therapeutics. Thorac Cancer 2014;5:473-86.
Guo L, Zhang T, Xiong Y, Yang Y. Roles of NOTCH1 as a therapeutic target and a biomarker for lung cancer: Controversies and perspectives. Dis Markers 2015;2015:520590.
Pardal R, Clarke MF, Morrison SJ. Applying the principles of stem-cell biology to cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:895-902.
Lobo NA, Shimono Y, Qian D, Clarke MF. The biology of cancer stem cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2007;23:675-99.
Balla MM, Ningthoujam RS, Kumar M, Bandekar JR, Pandey BN. Cellular and spectroscopic characterization of cancer stem cell-like cells derived from A549 lung carcinoma. J Cancer Res Ther 2016;12:1144-52.
Guseh JS, Bores SA, Stanger BZ, Zhou Q, Anderson WJ, Melton DA, et al.
Notch signaling promotes airway mucous metaplasia and inhibits alveolar development. Development 2009;136:1751-9.
Tsao PN, Chen F, Izvolsky KI, Walker J, Kukuruzinska MA, Lu J, et al.
Gamma-secretase activation of notch signaling regulates the balance of proximal and distal fates in progenitor cells of the developing lung. J Biol Chem 2008;283:29532-44.
Westhoff B, Colaluca IN, D'Ario G, Donzelli M, Tosoni D, Volorio S, et al.
Alterations of the notch pathway in lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:22293-8.
Osanyingbemi-Obidi J, Dobromilskaya I, Illei PB, Hann CL, Rudin CM. Notch signaling contributes to lung cancer clonogenic capacity in vitro
but may be circumvented in tumorigenesis in vivo
. Mol Cancer Res 2011;9:1746-54.
Ji X, Wang Z, Geamanu A, Sarkar FH, Gupta SV. Inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer cells by delta-tocotrienol is associated with notch-1 down-regulation. J Cell Biochem 2011;112:2773-83.
Zheng Q, Qin H, Zhang H, Li J, Hou L, Wang H, et al.
Notch signaling inhibits growth of the human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549. Oncol Rep 2007;17:847-52.
Takebe N, Miele L, Harris PJ, Jeong W, Bando H, Kahn M, et al.
Targeting notch, hedgehog, and wnt pathways in cancer stem cells: Clinical update. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2015;12:445-64.
Andersson ER, Lendahl U. Therapeutic modulation of notch signalling – Are we there yet? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2014;13:357-78.
Ntziachristos P, Lim JS, Sage J, Aifantis I. From fly wings to targeted cancer therapies: A centennial for notch signaling. Cancer Cell 2014;25:318-34.
Hassan WA, Yoshida R, Kudoh S, Hasegawa K, Niimori-Kita K, Ito T, et al.
Notch1 controls cell invasion and metastasis in small cell lung carcinoma cell lines. Lung Cancer 2014;86:304-10.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||Cigarette smoke upregulates Notch-1 signaling pathway and promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression
| ||Giuseppina Chiappara, Serena Di Vincenzo, Claudia Sangiorgi, Caterina Di Sano, Claudia D'Anna, Giovanni Zito, Chiara Cipollina, Patrizio Vitulo, Alessandro Bertani, Elisabetta Pace |
| ||Toxicology Letters. 2022; 355: 31 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Impact of Cancer Stem Cells and Cancer Stem Cell-Driven Drug Resiliency in Lung Tumor: Options in Sight
| ||Lourdes Cortes-Dericks, Domenico Galetta |
| ||Cancers. 2022; 14(2): 267 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Notch Signaling Pathway in CanceróReview with Bioinformatic Analysis
| ||Dorota Anusewicz, Magdalena Orzechowska, Andrzej K. Bednarek |
| ||Cancers. 2021; 13(4): 768 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Tideglusib suppresses stem-cell-like features and progression of osteosarcoma by inhibiting GSK-3Ŗ/NOTCH1 signaling
| ||Dandan Wei, Xinghao Zhu, Shanshan Li, Guangyao Liu, Yongkun Wang, Wei Wang, Qiao Zhang, Shiqing Jiang |
| ||Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2021; 554: 206 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Understanding stem cells and its pivotal role in regenerative medicine
| ||Arnab Sarkar, Sanjukta Saha, Abhik Paul, Avik Maji, Puspita Roy, Tapan Kumar Maity |
| ||Life Sciences. 2021; 273: 119270 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The translational values of TRIM family in pan-cancers: From functions and mechanisms to clinics
| ||Guo Zhao, Chuan Liu, Xin Wen, Gan Luan, Longxiang Xie, Xiangqian Guo |
| ||Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2021; 227: 107881 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Unlocking the Secrets of Cancer Stem Cells with ?-Secretase Inhibitors: A Novel Anticancer Strategy
| ||Maryam Ghanbari-Movahed, Zahra Ghanbari-Movahed, Saeideh Momtaz, Kaitlyn L. Kilpatrick, Mohammad Hosein Farzaei, Anupam Bishayee |
| ||Molecules. 2021; 26(4): 972 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||PD-1/PD-L1 axis regulation in cancer therapy: The role of long non-coding RNAs and microRNAs
| ||Milad Ashrafizadeh, Ali Zarrabi, Kiavash Hushmandi, Vahideh Zarrin, Ebrahim Rahmani Moghadam, Amirhossein Zabolian, Shima Tavakol, Saeed Samarghandian, Masoud Najafi |
| ||Life Sciences. 2020; 256: 117899 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Notch Transduction in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
| ||Amnah Sharif, Ann Shaji, May Chammaa, Eileen Pawlik, Rodrigo Fernandez-Valdivia |
| ||International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(16): 5691 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|