Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 324-328

Prognostic significance of tumor volume as determined on 3D ultrasound scan in uterine cervix cancer treated by radiotherapy

1 Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, J. K. Cancer Institute, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Radiodiagnosis, J. K. Cancer Institute, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Surendra Kumar Saini
Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, M. P. Shah Government Medical College, Jamnagar - 361 008, Gujarat
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.183201

Rights and Permissions

Aims: The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate prognostic significance of tumor volume determined by three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound scan in uterine cervix cancer patients treated by radiotherapy. Patients and Methods: A total of 67 patients of Stage IB2-IIIB were studied and analyzed. Cervical tumor volume was determined by 3D ultrasound scan. Two groups were made on the basis of volume on ultrasound scan (Group 1 <40 cc = 36 and Group 2 >40 cc = 31). Both groups received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intracavitary radiation therapy (ICRT). Cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 every week was given concurrently with external irradiation. Tumor volumes were taken by 3D USG every week during EBRT, after each fraction of ICRT, and after 8 weeks of completion of treatment. Primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS), and secondary endpoints were 5-year survival and toxicities. Results: After 2 months of completion of treatment, 1 out of 36 patients of Group A was having residual and 7 out of 31 of Group B were having residual diseases (P = 0.034). DFS and 5-year survival were significantly different in the groups (log rank test P = 0.0014, hazard ratio (HR) =2.3622 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3090–4.2625 and P = 0.0421, HR = 1.9274 95% CI 0.9998–3.7156, respectively). Conclusions: Ultrasound is a cheap, simple, and useful in predicting the outcome of treatment and DFS based on the tumor volume.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded138    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal